Chlamydia is the most common notifiable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States. This infection, which is caused by the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, is transmitted primarily through sexual activity, and less often, through vertical transmission at birth. Rates of chlamydial infection are particularly high in sexually active young women. Most persons who acquire C. trachomatis remain asymptomatic or experience only mild symptoms, leading to a significant number of persons with undiagnosed and untreated chlamydia. Individuals with chlamydial infection can also develop a broad array of symptomatic clinical manifestations. Untreated genital chlamydia in women can lead to major health consequences, including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), chronic pelvic pain, fallopian tube scarring, and infertility. Untreated rectal chlamydia in men who have sex with men (MSM) increases the risk of HIV acquisition. There are excellent diagnostics, treatment, and prevention strategies, if broadly used, that can markedly reduce transmission rates of and morbidity associated with C. trachomatis infection. In the following discussion, the terms “woman” or “women” are used to describe persons who have a female sex assigned at birth (persons with a cervix), including transgender men with cervix and gender diverse persons who have a cervix. Similarly, the terms “man” or “men” are used to describe persons who have male sex assigned a birth (persons with a penis), including transgender women with a penis and gender diverse persons who have a penis.
- Module 2 Overview
Self-Study Lessons 2nd Edition - 0%Lesson 1
Chlamydial InfectionsActivities- 0%Lesson 2
Gonococcal InfectionsActivities- 0%Lesson 3
SyphilisActivities- 0%Lesson 4
Genital HerpesActivities- 0%Lesson 5
Human Papillomavirus InfectionActivities- 0%Lesson 6
Pelvic Inflammatory DiseaseActivities- 0%Lesson 7
VaginitisActivities- 0%Lesson 8
MpoxActivities- 0%Lesson 9
Mycoplasma genitaliumActivitiesLesson 1. Chlamydial Infections
Learning Objective Performance Indicators
- Summarize the epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States
- Describe the microbiology, life cycle, and transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis
- Discuss the clinical manifestations of chlamydial infections in men, women, and children
- Compare the common laboratory diagnostic methods used to diagnose chlamydial infections
- Summarize routine chlamydial screening recommendations
- List recommended treatment regimens for chlamydial infections
- Summarize management of sex partners of persons diagnosed with chlamydia infection
Last Updated: August 13th, 2024Authors:David H. Spach, MD,David H. Spach, MD
Professor of Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, National STD Curriculum
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
University of WashingtonDisclosures: NoneStephen Jordan MD, PhDStephen J. Jordan MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of Infectious Diseases
Indiana University School of MedicineDisclosures: Grant to institution: Hologic
Honorarium: HologicReviewers:Natalie M. Neu, MD, MPH,Natalie M. Neu, MD, MPH
Professor of Pediatrics
Columbia University Medical Center
Medical Director
NYC STD Prevention and Training CenterDisclosures: NoneKimberly A. Workowski, MDKimberly A. Workowski, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Infectious Diseases
Emory UniversityDisclosures: NoneTable of Contents- Chlamydial Infections
- Introduction
- Epidemiology in the United States
- Microbiology, Pathogenesis, and Transmission
- Clinical Manifestations
- Laboratory Diagnosis
- Screening for Chlamydial Infection
- Treatment of Adolescents and Adults
- Management of Sex Partners
- Treatment of Neonates and Children
- Counseling and Education
- Summary Points
- Check-On-Learning
- Citations
- Additional References
- Figures
- Tables
Introduction
Epidemiology in the United States
2022 Chlamydia Surveillance Data
Chlamydia is the most common reportable bacterial STI in the United States, with 1,649,716 million reported cases in 2022 (Figure 1).[1] Since many persons with chlamydial infection may have minimal or no symptoms, the actual number of annual infections is significantly higher than the reported cases.[1] Overall, the number of reported chlamydia cases has significantly increased since reporting began in the 1980s, but this increase likely reflects an increase in the number of infections, but enhanced screening with more sensitive diagnostic tests may also have contributed to higher numbers of reported cases in recent years.[1] From 2021 to 2022, there was a minimal (0.3%) increase in reported cases of chlamydia in the United States.[1] The following summarizes several key epidemiologic features of chlamydial infections as reported for 2022 in the United States.[1]
- Sex: The chlamydial infection rate in women was 1.7 times higher than in men (621.2 versus 363.7 per 100,00 population).
- Age: For both females and males, the highest rates (per 100,000 population) of chlamydial infection occurred among those 20 to 24 years of age; among females, the second-highest rate was in persons 15 to 19 years of age, and for males, the second highest rate was for those 25 to 29 years of age.
- Race/Ethnicity: Rates of chlamydial infection were disproportionately higher among persons in certain racial and ethnic groups, with the highest rates among Black persons. Factors that may contribute to such inequities include differential access to quality health care, social and economic conditions, higher prevalence of disease in sexual networks, and differences in immunogenetic determinants that influence the immune response to chlamydia.
- Region and State: The South had the highest rate (per 100,000 population) of chlamydial infections. The five states with the highest rates (per 100,000 population) of reported chlamydia cases (in descending order) were Alaska, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Georgia. Of note, the rate of reported cases (per 100,000 population) in Washington DC was markedly higher than any state.
Factors Associated with Acquisition of Chlamydia
Factors associated with the acquisition of chlamydial infection include a previous or coexisting STI, new or multiple sex partners, a new sex partner, more than one partner, a sex partner who is having sex with other partners at the same time, as sex partner who has an STI, inconsistent condom use, history of incarceration, and exchanging sex for money or drugs.[2] The presence of columnar epithelial cells on the ectocervix, referred to as ectopy, is a condition that may increase susceptibility to chlamydial infection.[3,4] Adolescents and young adults are at increased risk for chlamydial infection for a combination of biological, behavioral, and cultural reasons, including difficulty accessing preventive health care services for STIs.
Impact
Untreated genital chlamydia infections can result in major complications for women, including pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, fallopian tube scarring, and infertility.[5,6] In the United States, for bacterial STIs, chlamydia has the highest lifetime direct medical cost (the total lifetime direct medical cost is calculated by multiplying the estimated number of incident infections in a year by the estimated lifetime cost per infection). In 2018, there were an estimated 2.35 million chlamydial infections acquired in the United States at an estimated total lifetime direct medical cost of $691.3 million.[7,8] In addition, studies have shown that rectal chlamydia infection in MSM increases the risk of HIV acquisition, which contributes to increases in the number of new HIV infections and subsequent HIV-related major lifetime medical costs.[9,10]
Microbiology, Pathogenesis, and Transmission
Organism and Classification
Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium with a cell wall and ribosomes similar to those of gram-negative organisms.[11] The C. trachomatis cell wall is unique in that it contains an outer lipopolysaccharide membrane, but it lacks peptidoglycan; within the cell wall, cysteine-rich proteins act as the functional peptidoglycan equivalent. The absence of peptidoglycan explains why the organism is not seen with standard Gram’s staining. Chlamydia trachomatis is a member of the Chlamydiaceae family. The genus Chlamydia includes three species that infect humans: C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae, and C. psittaci.
Chlamydia Serovars
The species C. trachomatis, which exclusively infects humans, can cause (1) trachoma in persons of all ages, (2) anogenital infections, lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV), and conjunctivitis in adolescents and adults, and (3) conjunctivitis and pneumonia in neonates. The type of clinical infection caused by C. trachomatis is usually determined by the outer membrane protein A (OmpA—also known as the major outer membrane protein [MOMP]), which can be determined based on serology (OmpA serovar) or molecular methods (OmpA genotype); these techniques are not routinely used for clinical purposes.[12,13,14] Genital, rectal, oropharyngeal, and conjunctival infections are usually caused by C. trachomatis serovars D through K (as is conjunctivitis and pneumonia in neonates), chronic keratoconjunctivitis (trachoma) by serovars A-C, and lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) by serovars L1-L3.[13,15] Although most C. trachomatis infections caused by OmpA types D through K in women and men are asymptomatic, clinical manifestations can develop with these OmpA types at any site of infection.Life Cycle
Chlamydia trachomatis typically infects columnar epithelial cells at mucosal sites, often becoming a chronic infection that may last months or even longer than a year if untreated. Chlamydia trachomatis has a complex reproductive cycle, typically requiring 48 to 72 hours to complete.[15,16] The organisms replicate within a host cell, frequently causing eventual death of the host cell.[17] The life cycle of C. trachomatis involves five key steps (Figure 2):
- The elementary body, a small, infectious, but nonreplicating particle found in secretions, attaches to and enters a host cell, such as an endocervical or urethral columnar epithelial cell. The contact with the host cell membrane causes the elementary body to induce its own endocytosis.
- Within 8 hours, the now-intracellular elementary body interacts with glycogen and transforms into a reticulate body, which begins to multiply within an isolated intracellular structure referred to as an inclusion. The reticulate bodies are the noninfectious replicating form.
- Within 48 hours, some reticulate bodies begin to reorganize back to elementary bodies.
- Within 72 hours, most of the reticulate bodies have transitioned back to elementary bodies, and the inclusion either undergoes lysis at the host cell wall or the intact inclusion (containing numerous elementary bodies) is released into the extracellular space, a process called extrusion.
- Regardless of whether the inclusion undergoes lysis or extrusion, the elementary bodies are released to infect adjacent cells or to be transmitted to and infect another person.
Transmission
Sexually-acquired C. trachomatis is highly transmissible—rates of C. trachomatis transmission between sex partners is approximately 55%, with a per-act transmission of urogenital infection of about 10%; transmission rates per sex act for rectal and oropharyngeal infection is unknown.[18] Sexual transmission rates per sex act are thought to be slightly higher from men-to-women than from women-to-men, but given the number of asymptomatic carriers in the general population, estimates for the rate of transmission remain imprecise. Transmission of C. trachomatis can also occur from mother-to-infant via the infant’s contact with the mother’s genital tract during birth. Among mothers with untreated chlamydial infection, the rate of transmission to the neonate is estimated at about 50%.[19]
Clinical Manifestations
Chlamydia trachomatis can cause a range of clinical syndromes in adults, including cervicitis, urethritis, proctitis, and conjunctivitis. In persons who develop symptomatic infection, the incubation period for C. trachomatis infection is estimated to be 7 to 21 days.Urogenital Infections in Women
Most women with urogenital chlamydial infection initially have no signs or symptoms, but may present later with a range of manifestations and complications, including cervicitis, urethritis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), perihepatitis, endometritis, salpingitis, or reactive arthritis.[20,21]
Cervicitis
The cervix is the site of infection in 75 to 80% of women with chlamydial infection and most women with cervical chlamydial infection are asymptomatic. When symptoms are present, they are often nonspecific, such as vague abdominal discomfort or spotting. Typically, the clinical examination of the cervix is normal in women with cervical chlamydial infection, but some may have findings that suggest cervicitis, such as mucopurulent endocervical discharge and spontaneous (or easily induced) endocervical bleeding.[22,23] Causes of mucopurulent cervicitis other than C. trachomatis include Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium.
Urethritis
Urethral infection with chlamydia in women is usually asymptomatic, but it may cause dysuria and urinary frequency, which can mimic acute cystitis.[24] Nearly all women with urethral chlamydial infection also have cervical infection.[24]
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Women with C. trachomatis infection can develop PID, which is a subclinical to acute clinical syndrome caused by the ascending spread of microorganisms from the cervix to the endometrium, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and contiguous structures (Figure 3).[20,25] Following untreated genital infection with C. trachomatis, PID develops in approximately 3% of women within 2 weeks and in 10% of women within 1 year.[26,27] Although most women with PID caused by C. trachomatis initially have a mild or subclinical illness, some present with lower abdominal pain and may have findings of cervical motion tenderness, with or without uterine or adnexal tenderness.[6,25] Chlamydia-associated PID can result in tubal scarring, which may lead to tubal factor infertility, increased risk for ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain.[20,28] Among women treated for PID caused by chlamydia, approximately 20% become infertile, 30% develop chronic pain, and 1% have an ectopic pregnancy when they conceive.[29] The extensive long-term morbidity associated with chlamydial infection underscores the importance of aggressive prevention, screening, and treatment programs.[30,31]
Perihepatitis (Fitz-Hugh-Curtis Syndrome)
Untreated pelvic infection in women with C. trachomatis can infrequently cause inflammation of the liver capsule, which is commonly referred to as perihepatitis or the Fitz-Hugh-Curtis Syndrome.[32,33] Although perihepatitis was initially attributed only to gonococcal infection, it is now known to be more often associated with chlamydial infection. Perihepatitis is characterized by right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever, which are generally accompanied by evidence of PID on physical examination.[34]
Urogenital Infection in Men
In men, C. trachomatis can cause an array of genitourinary clinical manifestations. Serious complications are uncommon in men, but they can manifest as epididymitis, reactive arthritis, proctitis, and proctocolitis.
Urethritis
The most common site for chlamydial infection in heterosexual men is the urethra. Although most men identified with urethral chlamydial infection have no symptoms, some will develop dysuria and urethral discharge, which is typically clear, mucoid, or mucopurulent; the clinical presentation is typically referred to as nongonococcal urethritis.[35] Although attempts to distinguish gonococcal urethritis from nongonococcal urethritis on clinical examination are not reliable, the discharge caused by C. trachomatis is usually less purulent than with gonococcal urethritis.
Epididymitis
In males, epididymitis is the most common local complication of urethral C. trachomatis infection, and persons with this complication typically develop unilateral scrotal pain, epididymal swelling, and tenderness.[36] For persons with epididymitis who have concomitant urethral discharge, most have at least 2 white blood cells per high power field on Gram’s staining of a urethral discharge specimen. Approximately 70% of sexually transmitted cases of epididymitis are due to C. trachomatis.[36]
Manifestations Seen in Men or Women
Conjunctivitis
Infection of the eye with C. trachomatis serovars D through K most often occurs in adults as a result of autoinoculation from genital tract secretions (hand to eye transmission).[37] This ocular disorder, which usually involves infection with C. trachomatis serovars D through K, manifests as chronic follicular conjunctivitis and is often referred to as adult inclusion conjunctivitis (Figure 4). The most common presentation is unilateral eye discomfort with hyperemia. Although these secretions may be mucopurulent, they are more often clear to cloudy.
Oropharyngeal Infection
In both men and women, oropharyngeal chlamydial infection is usually asymptomatic.[38] It can also present as acute tonsillitis, acute pharyngitis, or abnormal pharyngeal sensation syndrome. When clinical signs and symptoms are described, the presentation can range from minimally symptomatic disease (i.e. dry or pruritic throat) to exudative tonsillopharyngitis.[39]
Rectal Infection
Infection with C. trachomatis OmpA types D through K in the rectal region is usually asymptomatic. This infection can occur in men or women who engage in receptive anal intercourse. Among women, however, rates of rectal infection are substantial, even among those who do not have receptive anal intercourse; in these women, the rectal infection presumably occurs via autoinoculation from infected vaginal secretions.[40,41] Some men and women with rectal infection can develop proctitis or proctocolitis, which can manifest as rectal pain, mucoid or hemorrhagic discharge, fever, and/or tenesmus.[42,43] A clinical diagnosis can be supported via anoscopy findings (mucopurulent discharge, pain, and spontaneous or induced bleeding). Chronic infection can rarely cause scarring and fistula formation. Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV), which is caused by C. trachomatis serovars L1, L2, or L3, more often presents as proctitis or proctocolitis, and additional diagnostic methods, such as LGV-specific molecular testing are required to differentiate LGV from non-LGV strains of C. trachomatis. These molecular tests, however, are not widely available and results do not return within a time frame that would alter the clinical management.[44,45]
Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)
Lymphogranuloma venereum is caused by C. trachomatis serovars L1, L2, or L3; it is an uncommon infection in the United States, but sporadic cases and outbreaks have been reported among MSM, many of whom have HIV. Rectal manifestations with LGV can include anorectal pain, purulent rectal discharge, rectal bleeding, tenesmus, diarrhea, and constipation, which is clinically diagnosed as proctitis.[43,46] Although most cases of LGV in the United States are rectal infections, LGV can also cause inguinal lymphadenopathy characterized by multiple, unilateral, enlarged, matted, tender inguinal lymph nodes, termed “buboes” that may suppurate.[43,46] Systemic signs and symptoms, such as fever, chills, or myalgia, also may be present with either rectal or inguinal manifestations.[44] A self-limited genital ulcer sometimes occurs at the site of inoculation. Less often, oral ulceration can occur and may be associated with cervical adenopathy. Specimens from anogenital sites and lymph nodes can be obtained in an attempt to identify C. trachomatis by a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).
Reactive Arthritis
Reactive arthritis, previously referred to as Reiter’s syndrome, is a post-inflammatory autoimmune disease that can result from urogenital chlamydia infection. The characteristics of the syndrome include conjunctivitis, urethritis, oligoarthritis, skin lesions (keratoderma blennorrhagica), and circinate balanitis (Figure 5). This complication infrequently occurs, but when it does, the onset is typically 3 to 6 weeks after urogenital chlamydia infection, and it can occur even in persons who receive effective treatment for chlamydia infection. Reactive arthritis affects predominantly males, particularly those positive for HLA-B27, and it usually resolves within 3 to 6 months. Reactive arthritis may not respond to antimicrobial treatment, but symptoms usually respond to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents.
Chlamydial Infections in Infants and Children
Although chlamydial infections are now seen infrequently among infants and children in the United States, they must still be considered in the scenario of inadequate prenatal care. Among cases of perinatal chlamydial infection, the most common presentation is inclusion conjunctivitis, which occurs in about 25% of neonates born to mothers who have untreated cervical chlamydia infection. The second most common manifestation is neonatal pneumonia, and this occurs in only about 10 to 15% of infants of mothers who have untreated cervical chlamydia.
Conjunctivitis
For infants, conjunctivitis is the most common clinical condition resulting from perinatal transmission of chlamydia. This is often referred to as ophthalmia neonatorum. Ocular infection with C. trachomatis results from exposure of the neonate to infected secretions from the mother’s genital tract during birth, and the exposure may also involve mucous membranes of the oropharynx, urogenital tract, and rectum. Inclusion conjunctivitis occurs 5 to 14 days after delivery. The signs range from mild scant mucoid discharge to severe copious purulent discharge, chemosis, pseudomembrane formation, erythema, friability, and edema. Neonatal ocular prophylaxis with silver nitrate solution or antibiotic ointments for prevention of gonorrhea transmission does not prevent perinatal transmission of C. trachomatis from mother to infant. A chlamydial etiology should be considered for all infants aged 30 days or younger who have conjunctivitis. Note that neonatal conjunctivitis (ophthalmia neonatorum) is not the same disorder as trachoma.
Pneumonia
Chlamydial pneumonia in infants occurs 4 to 12 weeks after delivery. Notably, infection of the nasopharynx is thought to be a precursor condition that is usually asymptomatic, but can progress to pneumonia. The signs are cough, congestion, and tachypnea. Infants are usually afebrile, and rales are apparent with auscultation of the lungs.
Trachoma
Trachoma is the leading cause of preventable blindness in the world and is caused primarily by non-genital C. trachomatis serotypes A, B, Ba, and C.[47] Trachoma is found in select regions of the world, mostly in the Middle East and Southeast Asia. The disease is most often contracted person-to-person through hand (or fomite) contact with an infected eye, followed by autoinoculation. Most cases of trachoma occur in children in the setting of poor sanitary conditions and some cases result from fly transmission.[48] The process begins as follicular conjunctivitis, which, if untreated, progresses to an entropion wherein the eyelid turns inward and chronic eyelash abrasion results in opacification of the corneal surface over time. The disease is diagnosed clinically and treatment with single-dose azithromycin is usually effective. This disorder is not an STI, is not transmitted from mother-to-child during birth, and is not the same as neonatal conjunctivititis (ophthalmia neonatorum).
Urogenital Infection
Urogenital infections in preadolescent males and females are usually asymptomatic and can be the result of vertical transmission during the perinatal period.[21] Genital or rectal infection can persist for as long as 2 to 3 years, so infection in young children may be the result of perinatally-acquired infection. Sexual abuse is a major concern when chlamydia (or any STI) is detected in preadolescent males or females. The STI evaluation in a case of suspected abuse should be performed by, or in consultation with, an expert in the assessment of child sexual abuse. Only tests with high specificity should be used because of the legal and psychosocial consequences of a false-positive diagnosis.
Laboratory Diagnosis
The selection of a laboratory test to detect the presence of C. trachomatis is a critical component of disease management and prevention.[45] The testing technology has shifted from culture-based methods to molecular-based techniques and this represents a substantial improvement in test sensitivity and ease of specimen collection. The nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are the preferred testing method for diagnosing chlamydial infections; this testing method is preferred due to high sensitivity, very high specificity, ability to use on multiple different types of clinical specimens, and ease of transport.[45]
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT)
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) amplify nucleic acid sequences (either DNA or RNA) that are specific for the organism being detected. Similar to other nonculture tests, NAATs can detect replicating or nonviable organisms. Multiple commercially available NAATs are FDA-cleared as diagnostic tests for C. trachomatis on urine specimens from men and women, urethral secretions in men, and endocervical swabs in women; some tests are cleared for vaginal swabs.[21] In addition, in May 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared two NAATs for diagnostic testing of chlamydia at extragenital sites (pharynx and rectum); the two tests are the Aptima Combo 2 Assay and the Xpert CT/NG.[49] For chlamydia testing in men, NAATs are highly sensitive for detecting C. trachomatis in either urethral secretions or a first-catch urine specimen, but most experts prefer using first-catch urine samples.[21,45] For women, vaginal swabs are preferred over urine samples since they are more sensitive than urine samples. Several studies have shown that self-collected vaginal swabs are preferred by women and perform equal to or better than clinician-collected vaginal swabs.[50,51,52,53,54] In addition, in men and women, self-collected rectal swabs for NAAT have also performed well.[55] Nucleic acid amplification tests do not distinguish non-LGV from LGV serovars.
Point-of-Care NAAT Testing
In March 2021, the FDA approved the first point-of-care NAAT (Binx Health IO CT/NG Assay) for the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydia and gonorrhea.[56] This point-of-care test can be run on vaginal swabs obtained from women or on urine samples collected from men.[56] This assay can provide a result in approximately 30 minutes.[56] In a cross-sectional study, investigators evaluated this point-of-care NAAT for the diagnosis of chlamydia and gonorrhea using vaginal swabs obtained from 1,523 women and urine samples collected from 922 men.[57] For chlamydia, the sensitivity estimates were 96.1% in women and 92.5% in men; the specificity estimates were 99.1% for women and 99.3% for men.[57] In addition, the investigators found that self-obtained vaginal swabs in women performed equivalent to clinician-collected vaginal swabs.[57]
Non-amplification Molecular Tests
Molecular tests that do not use nucleic acid amplification encompass a variety of antigen detection and nucleic acid hybridization methods. These tests include enzyme-immunoassays (EIA), direct fluorescent antibody tests (DFA), and nucleic acid hybridization tests—a distinct non-NAAT methodology that can detect C. trachomatis-specific DNA or RNA sequences in ribosomal RNA, genomic DNA, or plasmid DNA. All have a significantly lower sensitivity (range 50% to 75%) than NAATs.[58] These non-amplification tests are rarely used in clinical practice, and they are classified as not recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).[21]
Culture
Historically, cell culture to detect C. trachomatis was the most sensitive and specific method available to detect chlamydial infection. Cell culture, however, is technically complex, expensive, difficult to standardize, and has a lower sensitivity than amplification tests. In addition, performing C. trachomatis cell culture requires collection of C. trachomatis elementary bodies from relevant anatomical site(s) and use of stringent transport requirements. Because of their excellent sensitivity and specificity, NAATs have replaced the use of culture in most clinical situations; the use of culture for C. trachomatis is primarily limited to evaluation of suspected cases of sexual abuse in children.
Serology
Serologic testing is rarely used in clinical practice to diagnose genital infections caused by C. trachomatis and chlamydia serologic tests do not reliably distinguish current from prior infection. Two main types of serologic tests are used for diagnosis: (1) chlamydia complement fixation test (CFT), which measures antibody against group-specific lipopolysaccharide antigen, and (2) microimmunofluorescence (MIF).[45]
Diagnosing LGV
Since routinely used NAATs for diagnosing chlamydial infections do not distinguish non-LGV strains of C. trachomatis from LGV strains, additional diagnostic methods, such as LGV-specific molecular testing with PCR genotyping, are required to make a laboratory diagnosis of LGV. These molecular tests, however, are not widely available and results do not return within a time frame that would alter clinical management.[44,45] In addition, chlamydia serologic testing is not recommended for diagnosing LGV.[59] Therefore, the diagnosis of LGV should be based on epidemiologic information, compatible clinical findings, and a positive C. trachomatis NAAT at the symptomatic anatomic site.[59]
Diagnosing Ophthalmia Neonatorum in Neonates
The diagnosis of chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum should be suspected in any infant with conjunctivitis that occurs within 30 days after birth. Diagnostic testing for chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum is unique in that DFA is the only nonculture, FDA-cleared test from conjunctival swabs. Nucleic acid amplification tests are not FDA cleared for this site, but local validation studies can be done to support its use. Culture can also be performed on the everted eyelid using a Dacron-tipped swab specified by the testing kit. The specimens must contain epithelial cells, not just the exudate.
Diagnostic Evaluation of Suspected Sexual Abuse in Children
In the routine workup of suspected sexual abuse in children, testing for C. trachomatis (and Neisseria gonorrhoeae) should be included.[60] Due to major legal implications involved in these cases, it is advised that clinical teams work with child advocacy centers prior to embarking on testing and evaluation. For this testing, culture or NAAT can be used, but with special considerations.[60] If a NAAT is used, there is the potential for false-positive results to occur; therefore, consultation with an expert should be part of this process.[60] In addition, because of the profound implications of making a diagnosis of an STI in a child, only Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA)-validated, FDA-cleared NAATs should be used in this setting.[21] Further, all initial positive tests require confirmatory testing.[45,60] All specimens should be retained for additional confirmatory testing. Other nonculture tests, such as DFA, are not recommended in this setting because of poor specificity.
Reporting Requirements
Laws and regulations in all states require that persons diagnosed with chlamydia be reported to local public health authorities. Reporting can be done by medical providers, laboratories, or both.
Screening for Chlamydial Infection
Screening for chlamydial infection in asymptomatic persons has been found to significantly reduce the incidence of chlamydia–associated PID.[30,61,62] In general, routine screening for chlamydia should utilize NAAT as the diagnostic test; the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared NAATs for chlamydia testing on (1) male and female urine samples; (2) male and female rectal and throat samples; (3) clinician-collected endocervical, vaginal, and male urethral samples; and (4) self-collected vaginal swabs if obtained in a clinical setting. Data indicate that self-collected urine and rectal swabs are comparable to clinician-collected swabs and may even be preferable.[55,63] The following summarizes recommendations for chlamydial screening in the 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines.[21,64,65]
Women Who Have Sex with Men [2,64]
- All sexually active women younger than 25 years of age should undergo annual screening. The rationale for this recommendation is threefold: (1) the incidence of chlamydial infection is highest in women 15-25 years of age, (2) chlamydia infection is typically asymptomatic in women, and (3) untreated chlamydial infection in women can cause severe health and reproductive complications. For certain young women, particularly adolescents, more frequent screening (at 3- to 6-month intervals) may be indicated based on their sexual activity.
- Women 25 years of age and older should undergo annual screening if they are considered to have increased risk for chlamydial infection (e.g. those who have a new sex partner, more than one sex partner, a sex partner with concurrent partners, or a sex partner who has an STI).
- Screening for rectal chlamydia (based on history of receptive anal or oral sex) should be considered through a shared clinical decision-making process between the woman and the health care provider.
Women Who Have Sex with Women [66]
- Screening for chlamydial infection in sexually active women who have sex with women should be offered per the screening guidelines for sexually active women who have sex with men.
Pregnant Women [64,67]
- At the first prenatal visit, screen all pregnant women younger than 25 years of age.
- At the first prenatal visit, screen all pregnant women 25 years of age and older who have increased risk for chlamydial infection (e.g. those who have a new sex partner, more than one sex partner, a sex partner with concurrent partners, or a sex partner who has an STI).
- Retest for chlamydial infection during the third trimester in all women younger than 25 years of age and in women older than 25 years of age who have an increased risk of acquiring chlamydial infection (e.g. those who have a new sex partner, more than one sex partner, a sex partner with concurrent partners, or a sex partner who has an STI).
- Pregnant women diagnosed with chlamydia should have a test-of-cure 4 weeks after completing treatment and repeat testing for chlamydia within 3 months after completing treatment.
Men Who Have Sex Only with Women [21,64]
- Routine screening for chlamydial infection is not recommended for sexually active men who have sex only with women. The rationale for this recommendation is the low risk for chlamydial infection in men who have sex only with women, and the lack of data to show benefit of screening this population. Nevertheless, targeted screening for men should be considered if resources permit, the community prevalence is high, and such screening does not hinder chlamydia screening efforts for women.
- Screening can be considered in sexually active young men in high chlamydia prevalence settings, including adolescent clinics, correctional facilities, STI clinics, or sexual health clinics.
Men Who Have Sex with Men [64,68]
- All sexually active men who have sex with men should undergo screening at least annually.
- Screening should consist of testing urethral and rectal sites for those who report exposures at these sites during sexual activity, regardless of condom use during sexual activity. The preferred tests (self-collected or provider-collected) are urine NAAT and rectal NAAT.
- Routine testing of oropharyngeal testing for chlamydia infection is not recommended. For MSM, gonococcal screening of the oral pharynx is recommended; since some NAAT tests for gonorrhea can detect both N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis, the results will be reported for both pathogens.
- More frequent screening at 3- to 6-month intervals is indicated for men who have sex with men if they have increased risk (e.g. persons taking HIV preexposure prophylaxis, individuals with HIV, persons with ongoing risk for acquiring chlamydia, and persons who have multiple sex partners or their sex partners have multiple partners).
Transgender and Gender Diverse Persons [64,69]
- Screening for chlamydial infection in transgender and gender diverse persons should be based on the person’s sexual practices, age, and genital anatomy. For example, if an individual is sexually active, younger than 25 years of age, has a cervix, and identifies as a transgender man or nonbinary, they should have annual chlamydial screening, similar to screening in cisgender women who have a cervix.
- Screening for transgender women who have undergone vaginoplasty surgery should include screening of the neovagina. The optimal method for neovagina chlamydial screening (vaginal swab versus urine) is not known.
- Screening for chlamydia infection in transgender men who have undergone metoidioplasty surgery (with urethral lengthening), but not vaginectomy, should utilize a vaginal swab to detect cervical infection due to the low yield of urine testing in this post-surgical setting.
Persons with HIV [64,70]
- Screening for chlamydial infection is recommended for persons with HIV who are sexually active; the screening should take place at the initial evaluation and at least annually thereafter.
- More frequent screening (e.g. every 3 to 6 months) may be indicated for persons with HIV based on risk activity, persons on HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and local prevalence of specific STIs.
- Testing samples should be obtained from the anatomic sites of sexual exposure. Note that routine screening for oropharyngeal chlamydia infection is not recommended, but since some NAATs used for gonorrhea can detect both N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis, screening for pharyngeal gonorrhea may also include results for chlamydia.
Correctional Facilities [71]
- Routine opt-out screening for chlamydial infection screening of all sites of sexual activity (pharyngeal, urethral or vaginal, and rectal) should be offered during intake (or within 48 hours of intake) at correctional facilities for all females 35 years of age and younger and all males younger than 30 years of age.
Treatment of Adolescents and Adults
General Approach
The treatment of all persons with chlamydial infection is of high priority for two important reasons: (1) to reduce the risk of adverse reproductive health complications and (2) to decrease the sexual transmission of C. trachomatis to others. In addition, treatment for chlamydial infection should occur without delay in order to minimize complications, particularly PID in women. The following summarizes recommendations in the 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines for the treatment of chlamydial infections.[21]
Adolescents and Adults with Urogenital Chlamydia Infections
The recommended treatment for nonpregnant adolescents and adults with uncomplicated chlamydial infections at urethral, cervical, rectal, and oropharyngeal sites is doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days; alternative options include azithromycin 1 gram orally in a single dose and levofloxacin 500 mg orally given daily for 7 days (Table 1).[21] In persons for whom adherence with doxycycline is a substantial concern, consideration can be given for using the alternative single-dose oral azithromycin regimen. The following outlines several reasons why doxycycline is now preferred over azithromycin for urogenital chlamydial infections.
- Two randomized, double-blind clinical trials have shown that a 7-day course of doxycycline is superior to single-dose azithromycin for the treatment of asymptomatic rectal chlamydial infections among MSM (Figure 6).[72,73] Several additional, nonrandomized studies have also shown that a 7-day course of doxycycline is superior to single-dose azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydial infections among MSM.[74,75]
- Several studies have also shown that a significant number (33-83%) of women diagnosed with urogenital chlamydial infection also had C. trachomatis detected at the anorectal site, even though most did not report having receptive anal sex.[40]
- One prospective, open-label study in persons with pharyngeal chlamydia suggested better treatment responses with a 7-day course of doxycycline than with single-dose azithromycin.[76]
- Chlamydia treatment studies in women have been conflicting. Several randomized, controlled trials have shown equal efficacy with a 7-day course of doxycycline and single-dose azithromycin.[77,78] In an observational study that compared the effectiveness of azithromycin and doxycycline in uncomplicated rectal and vaginal chlamydial infections in women, microbiologic cure rates for vaginal infections were similar for the two regimens, but cure rates were much higher with doxycycline than azithromycin for rectal infections (Figure 7).[79]
Treatment of Chlamydial Infections During Pregnancy
The recommended regimen for the treatment of chlamydial infections in pregnant women is azithromycin 1 gram orally in a single dose; amoxicillin is the alternative medication.[21,80,81,82,83].(Table 2).[21] Doxycycline and levofloxacin are not recommended for the treatment of chlamydial infections in pregnancy.[21] Erythromycin is no longer recommended for the treatment of chlamydia during pregnancy due to gastrointestinal side effects that make adherence challenging for the mother during pregnancy. All pregnant women treated for chlamydial infection should have a test-of-cure performed 4 weeks after completing therapy and all should be retested 3 months after treatment for reinfection.[21]
Adults with Oropharyngeal Chlamydial Infections
The clinical significance of oropharyngeal C. trachomatis infection remains unclear, and routine screening for oropharyngeal C. trachomatis infection is not recommended. Nevertheless, since oropharyngeal C. trachomatis can be transmitted to genital sites of sex partners[84,85], detection of C. trachomatis from an oropharyngeal sample warrants the same treatment as with urogenital chlamydial infection: doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days as the preferred regimen for nonpregnant adults and azithromycin 1 gram single dose orally preferred for pregnant persons.[21]
Treatment for LGV
The recommended treatment for C. trachomatis infections caused by LGV strains is oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 21 days; note this treatment is significantly longer than the 7-day treatment for non-LGV chlamydia strains [Regimens] 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines: Diseases Characterized by Genital, Anal, or Perianal Ulcers: Lymphogranuloma Venereum.[21,59] The alternative LGV treatment regimens include oral azithromycin 1 gram weekly for 3 weeks or oral erythromycin base 500 mg four times daily for 21 days.[59] Since practical laboratory diagnostic methods are not available for making a timely diagnosis of LGV, the indication to provide LGV treatment (doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 21 days) should be based on epidemiologic information, compatible clinical finding, and a positive C. trachomatis NAAT at the symptomatic anatomic site.[59] In addition, empiric therapy for LGV is indicated for persons in whom (1) symptoms or signs of proctocolitis (e.g. bloody discharge, tenesmus, or ulceration), (2) those with severe inguinal lymphadenopathy with bubo formation, especially if the individual reports recently having a genital ulcer, and (3) persons with a genital ulcer and other causes for the genital ulcer have been excluded.[59]Post-treatment Follow-Up and Retesting
The CDC does not recommend routine test-of-cure after completing therapy for chlamydia in nonpregnant persons, but all females and males should return for follow-up and repeat testing approximately 3 months after receiving treatment for chlamydial infection, due to the substantial risk of reinfection during that 3-month period.[21,86,87] If an individual is treated for chlamydia and continues to have symptoms (or they have resolution and recurrence of symptoms), then reevaluation and retesting may be indicated. Repeat NAAT testing within the first 4 weeks after treatment of chlamydial infection is not recommended due to the high rates of false-positive test results from detection of residual noninfectious (dead or inactive) chlamydial organisms.[88,89]
Management of Sex Partners
Evaluation and Treatment of Sex Partners
For persons diagnosed with urogenital chlamydial infection, all sex partners with whom they had sexual contact during the 60 days preceding the onset of symptoms or chlamydia diagnosis should be referred for evaluation, testing, and presumptive treatment of chlamydia.[21] If no sex contacts have occurred in the 60 days before the diagnosis of chlamydia or onset of symptoms, then the most recent sex partner prior to that 60-day period should be evaluated and treated.[21] All sex contacts should have testing for STIs as part of the evaluation process. The sex contacts should receive presumptive treatment for chlamydia without waiting for their STI test results to ensure the treatment does not depend on an additional follow-up visit. The empiric treatment for nonpregnant sex contacts is oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days and for pregnant contacts it is azithromycin 1 gram orally as a single dose. The purpose of performing an evaluation for the contact, even if they will receive presumptive treatment, is to perform counseling and screening for other STIs, which may require treatment. For neonates or infants diagnosed with chlamydial infection, it is important that mothers and their sex partners undergo diagnostic evaluation and receive empiric treatment for chlamydial infection.
Use of Expedited Partner Therapy
Certain situations may arise in which sexual contacts are unable or unwilling to present for evaluation, testing, and treatment. In this scenario, there may be an option to provide expedited partner therapy (EPT)—a process whereby the patient diagnosed with chlamydia delivers treatment (or a prescription for treatment)—to the recent sex partner, without a medical provider examining the partner. This strategy has been demonstrated to decrease the rate of recurrent or persistent chlamydia infection.[90,91,92] There are concerns regarding the use of EPT for MSM, since, ideally, these individuals would get tested for other STIs, such as syphilis and HIV, during a clinic visit.[21] The use of EPT for MSM should therefore be performed on a shared-decision basis. Finally, expedited partner therapy is not legal in all states; the CDC maintains an updated information page (Legal Status of Expedited Partner Therapy) that identifies the legal status of expedited partner therapy in each state in the United States.
Treatment of Neonates and Children
Infants Born to Mothers with Chlamydial Infection
When neonatal chlamydial infection occurs, it results from neonatal contact with a chlamydia-infected cervix during the birth process. Neonatal chlamydial infection most often manifests as conjunctivitis (ophthalmia neonatorum) that develops 5 to 12 days after birth or as a subacute, afebrile pneumonia with onset at ages 1 to 3 months. The erythromycin eye ointment that is routinely given to neonates at birth to prevent neonatal gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum does not prevent neonatal chlamydial eye infection.[21] The most effective strategy for preventing perinatal chlamydia transmission is to screen pregnant women for chlamydial infection and promptly treat those women who test positive. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is not recommended for infants who are born to mothers at high risk for chlamydia or who have untreated chlamydia. In this situation, the recommended approach is to monitor the infant for signs and symptoms of chlamydial infection and promptly evaluate and treat any documented infection in the neonate.[21]
Neonates with Ophthalmia Neonatorum
The recommended treatment regimen for the neonate with ophthalmia neonatorum is a 14-day course of oral erythromycin base or erythromycin ethylsuccinate (Table 4).[21] Data on oral azithromycin for the treatment of neonatal chlamydial infection are limited, but a small study suggested a short 3-day course of azithromycin may be effective.[93] The use of topical erythromycin alone is not effective for ophthalmia neonatorum, and it is not recommended for use in combination with oral antibiotics.[21] The use of a recommended or alternative therapy has an efficacy of only approximately 80% and some infants require treatment with a second course of antibiotics. Treatment with oral erythromycin or oral azithromycin in infants during the first 6 weeks of life has been associated with an increased risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.[94,95,96,97] Thus, all infants with chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum should have close follow-up to determine the treatment response and to evaluate signs and symptoms of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.[96]
Infant Pneumonia
For infants with pneumonia caused by C. trachomatis, the recommended treatment is a 14-day regimen of oral erythromycin base or erythromycin ethylsuccinate; the alternative regimen is a 3-day course of oral azithromycin (Table 5).[21] The treatment for chlamydial pneumonia in neonates often occurs empirically, based on the infant's chest radiographic findings, the age of the infant, and the mother’s epidemiologic risk for chlamydial infection.[21] In situations when presumptive therapy is used in a situation with a high degree of suspicion of chlamydial infection, and there is considerable concern that follow-up will not occur, the 3-day azithromycin alternative regimen can be used.[21]
Chlamydial Infections in Infants and Children
The treatment of infants and children with chlamydia is stratified into three groups: (1) younger than 8 years of age and weight less than 45 kg, (2) younger than 8 years of age and weight 45 kg or greater, and (3) age 8 or older (Table 6). In infants and children who weigh less than 45 kg, the preferred treatment of chlamydial infections is a 14-day course of oral erythromycin base or oral erythromycin ethylsuccinate.[21] For children younger than 8 years of age and weighing 45 kg or greater, the recommended regimen is single-dose oral azithromycin. Children older than 8 years of age should be treated with single-dose oral azithromycin or a 7-day course of oral doxycycline.[21] A follow-up visit with chlamydia test-of-cure is recommended approximately 4 weeks after completion of treatment to evaluate for treatment effectiveness.[21]
Management of Mothers and Their Sex Partners
For neonates or infants diagnosed with chlamydial infection, it is important that mothers and their sex partners undergo diagnostic evaluation and receive empiric treatment for chlamydial infection.[21]
Check-on-Learning QuestionCheck
-On-
Learning
QuestionA 1-week-old baby boy is evaluated for discharge from his left eye. A clinical diagnosis of inclusion conjunctivitis is made, and laboratory evaluation confirms a diagnosis of chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum.What is the main gastrointestinal adverse effect of concern for infants who receive erythromycin and azithromycin during the first 6 weeks of life?
Counseling and Education
The following summarizes key counseling messages for persons diagnosed with chlamydial infection.
- Resuming Sexual Activity: Persons treated for chlamydial infection should receive instructions to abstain from sexual activity until all the following criteria are met: (1) they have completed a course of doxycycline or at least 7 days have elapsed since completing single-dose treatment with azithromycin, (2) any genitourinary symptoms have resolved, and (3) if they are planning to resume sexual activity with a recent sex partner, the sex partner should have completed a course of doxycycline or at least 7 days have elapsed since the partner was treated with azithromycin.
- Partner Notification: It is extremely important that persons treated for chlamydial infection understand the importance of partner notification (for all sex partners in the prior 60 days). Partner notification with evaluation and treatment can markedly reduce the spread of STIs in the community, and it also reduces the likelihood of reinfection for the person diagnosed with chlamydia.
- Follow-Up Testing: It is important that all persons treated for chlamydia have a follow-up visit in approximately 3 months to have repeat STI testing. The purpose of this 3-month visit is to test for reinfection with chlamydia, as well as to test for other STIs that could have been acquired in the 3-month post-treatment time frame.
- Complications of Chlamydial Infection: Even with appropriate antimicrobial treatment, chlamydial infection can have long-term sequelae in women, and to a lesser extent in men. Accordingly, basic counseling on chlamydial-associated potential complications should ideally be performed at the time of the initial diagnosis or, at the 3-month follow-up visit.
- STI Prevention and Screening: At the time a person is receiving treatment for an STI, it is appropriate to provide counseling messages on how to prevent STIs in the future (e.g. limiting the number of sex partners and consistently using condoms). In addition, clinicians should use any opportunity to highlight the high importance of routine chlamydia screening for those in whom it is indicated, especially for sexually active females 14 through 24 years of age.
Summary Points
- Chlamydia is the most common reportable bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the United States, with approximately 1.65 million cases reported in 2022.
- The highest rates of chlamydia infections in the United States are in females aged 15 to 24 years of age.
- Chlamydia trachomatis frequently causes asymptomatic infection; it can also cause a wide range of clinical manifestations, including cervicitis, urethritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and pelvic pain in women, as well as urethritis and epididymitis in men.
- Less common manifestations in men and women may include conjunctivitis, oropharyngeal infection, proctitis or proctocolitis, and reactive arthritis.
- Infants born to mothers with untreated C. trachomatis infection may develop conjunctivitis, pneumonia, and urogenital infection.
- Screening for chlamydia in asymptomatic persons significantly reduces the incidence of chlamydia-associated complications and is recommended in all sexually active women younger than 25 years of age, as well as in other persons at high risk of chlamydial infection.
- In most circumstances, the preferred method to diagnose chlamydia is a NAAT, which is FDA-cleared for chlamydia testing on (1) male and female urine samples; (2) male and female rectal and throat samples; (3) clinician-collected endocervical, vaginal, and male urethral samples, and (4) self-collected vaginal swabs if obtained in a clinical setting.
- For adults and adolescents, the recommended treatment for urogenital chlamydial infections in nonpregnant females and all males is a 7-day course of oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily. The recommended treatment for pregnant females is 1 gram of oral azithromycin.
- The diagnosis of LGV should be based on epidemiologic information, compatible clinical finding, and a positive C. trachomatis NAAT at the symptomatic anatomic site. The recommended treatment for LGV is a 21-day course of oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily.
- Recent sex partners of persons diagnosed with chlamydial infection should be referred for evaluation and presumptive treatment; expedited partner therapy should be considered in certain circumstances.
Check-On-Learning Questions Display Options
These quick questions are meant to keep you on track and check your understanding. They appear throughout the core concepts and are listed here for you to review.Check-on-Learning QuestionCheck
-On-
Learning
QuestionA 1-week-old baby boy is evaluated for discharge from his left eye. A clinical diagnosis of inclusion conjunctivitis is made, and laboratory evaluation confirms a diagnosis of chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum.What is the main gastrointestinal adverse effect of concern for infants who receive erythromycin and azithromycin during the first 6 weeks of life?
Citations
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2022. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; April 2024.[CDC] -
- 2.US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, et al. Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;326:949-56.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 3.Lee V, Tobin JM, Foley E. Relationship of cervical ectopy to chlamydia infection in young women. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006;32:104-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 4.Machado Junior LC, Dalmaso AS, Carvalho HB. Evidence for benefits from treating cervical ectopy: literature review. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008;126:132-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 5.Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, Low N, Xu F, Ness RB. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J Infect Dis. 2010;201 Suppl 2:S134-55.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 6.Ross JD. Pelvic inflammatory disease. BMJ Clin Evid. 2013;2013.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 7.Chesson HW, Spicknall IH, Bingham A, et al. The Estimated Direct Lifetime Medical Costs of Sexually Transmitted Infections Acquired in the United States in 2018. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48:215-21.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 8.Kreisel KM, Spicknall IH, Gargano JW, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2018. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48:208-14.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 9.Bernstein KT, Marcus JL, Nieri G, Philip SS, Klausner JD. Rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia reinfection is associated with increased risk of HIV seroconversion. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:537-43.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 10.Chesson HW, Song R, Bingham A, Farnham PG. The Estimated Number and Lifetime Medical Cost of HIV Infections Attributable to Sexually Transmitted Infections Acquired in the United States in 2018: A Compilation of Published Modeling Results. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48:292-298.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 11.Darville T, Hiltke TJ. Pathogenesis of genital tract disease due to Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis. 2010;201 Suppl 2:S114-25.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 12.Geisler WM, Black CM, Bandea CI, Morrison SG. Chlamydia trachomatis OmpA genotyping as a tool for studying the natural history of genital chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84:541-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 13.Geisler WM, Suchland RJ, Whittington WL, Stamm WE. The relationship of serovar to clinical manifestations of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:160-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 14.Geisler WM. Duration of untreated, uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and factors associated with chlamydia resolution: a review of human studies. J Infect Dis. 2010;201 Suppl 2:S104-13.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 15.Elwell C, Mirrashidi K, Engel J. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:385-400.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 16.Cossé MM, Hayward RD, Subtil A. One Face of Chlamydia trachomatis: The Infectious Elementary Body. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2018;412:35-58.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 17.Moulder JW. Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55:143-90.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 18.Althaus CL, Turner KM, Mercer CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1-100, vii-viii.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 19.Schachter J, Grossman M, Sweet RL, Holt J, Jordan C, Bishop E. Prospective study of perinatal transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis. JAMA. 1986;255:3374-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 20.Wiesenfeld HC. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:765-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 21.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Chlamydial infections. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 22.Marrazzo JM, Martin DH. Management of women with cervicitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44 Suppl 3:S102-10.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 23.Taylor SN. Cervicitis of unknown etiology. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014;16:409.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 24.Bradley MG, Hobson D, Lee N, Tait IA, Rees E. Chlamydial infections of the urethra in women. Genitourin Med. 1985;61:371-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 25.Brunham RC, Gottlieb SL, Paavonen J. Pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2039-48.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 26.Hook EW 3rd, Spitters C, Reichart CA, Neumann TM, Quinn TC. Use of cell culture and a rapid diagnostic assay for Chlamydia trachomatis screening. JAMA. 1994;272:867-70.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 27.Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Aghaizu A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1642.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 28.Brunham RC, Binns B, McDowell J, Paraskevas M. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women with ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:722-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 29.Ness RB, Soper DE, Holley RL, et al. Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment strategies for women with pelvic inflammatory disease: results from the Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) Randomized Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:929-37.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 30.Hillis SD, Wasserheit JN. Screening for chlamydia--a key to the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1399-401.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 31.LeFevre ML; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:902-10.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 32.Money DM, Hawes SE, Eschenbach DA, et al. Antibodies to the chlamydial 60 kd heat-shock protein are associated with laparoscopically confirmed perihepatitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:870-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 33.Wang SP, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK, Wager G, Grayston JT. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:1034-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 34.Ris HW. Perihepatitis (Fitz-Hugh--Curtis syndrome). A review and case presentation. J Adolesc Health Care. 1984;5:272-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 35.Moi H, Blee K, Horner PJ. Management of non-gonococcal urethritis. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:294.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 36.Taylor SN. Epididymitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61 Suppl 8:S770-3.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 37.Garland SM, Malatt A, Tabrizi S, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis. Prevalence and association with genital tract infection. Med J Aust. 1995;162:363-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 38.Karlsson A, Österlund A, Forssén A. Pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis is not uncommon any more. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43:344-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 39.Oztürk O, Seven H. Chlamydia trachomatis tonsillopharyngitis. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:736107.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 40.Dukers-Muijrers NH, Schachter J, van Liere GA, Wolffs PF, Hoebe CJ. What is needed to guide testing for anorectal and pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women and men? Evidence and opinion. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:533.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 41.Gratrix J, Singh AE, Bergman J, et al. Evidence for increased Chlamydia case finding after the introduction of rectal screening among women attending 2 Canadian sexually transmitted infection clinics. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:398-404.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 42.Hoentjen F, Rubin DT. Infectious proctitis: when to suspect it is not inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:269-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 43.Handsfield HH. Lymphogranuloma venereum treatment and terminology. Sex Transm Dis. 2018;45:409-411.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 44.Schachter J, Moncada J. Lymphogranuloma venereum: how to turn an endemic disease into an outbreak of a new disease? Start looking. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:331-2.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 45.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63:1-19.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 46.Stoner BP, Cohen SE. Lymphogranuloma venereum 2015: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61 Suppl 8:S865-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 47.Cook JA. Eliminating blinding trachoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1777-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 48.Taylor HR, Burton MJ, Haddad D, West S, Wright H. Trachoma. Lancet. 2014;384:2142-52.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 49.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA clears first diagnostic tests for extragenital testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea. FDA news release. May 23, 2019.[U.S. FDA] -
- 50.Knox J, Tabrizi SN, Miller P, et al. Evaluation of self-collected samples in contrast to practitioner-collected samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction among women living in remote areas. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:647-54.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 51.Lunny C, Taylor D, Hoang L, et al. Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea screening: a systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132776.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 52.Schachter J, Chernesky MA, Willis DE, et al. Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results from a multicenter evaluation of the APTIMA assays for both infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:725-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 53.Chernesky MA, Hook EW 3rd, Martin DH, et al. Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:729-33.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 54.Masek BJ, Arora N, Quinn N, et al. Performance of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of self-collected vaginal swabs obtained via an Internet-based screening program. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1663-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 55.Van der Helm JJ, Hoebe CJ, van Rooijen MS, et al. High performance and acceptability of self-collected rectal swabs for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in men who have sex with men and women. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36:493-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 56.U.S. Food and Drug Administration: FDA News Release. FDA allows for first point-of-care Chlamydia and Gonorrhea test to be used in more near-patient care settings. FDA news release. March 30, 2021.[U.S. FDA] -
- 57.Van Der Pol B, Taylor SN, Mena L, et al. Evaluation of the Performance of a Point-of-Care Test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e204819.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 58.Jensen IP, Fogh H, Prag J. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: evaluation of a urine sample tested by enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in comparison with a cervical and/or a urethral swab tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9:194-201.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 59.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Diseases characterized by genital, anal, or perianal ulcers: lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 60.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Sexual assault and abuse and STIs. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 61.Hu D, Hook EW 3rd, Goldie SJ. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:501-13.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 62.Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich FE, Andrilla H, Holmes KK, Stamm WE. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1362-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 63.Sexton ME, Baker JJ, Nakagawa K, et al. How reliable is self-testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia among men who have sex with men? J Fam Pract. 2013;62:70-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 64.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Screening recommendations and considerations referenced in treatment guidelines and original sources. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 65.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 66.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: women who have sex with women (WSW) and women who have sex with women and men (WSWM). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 67.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: pregnant women. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 68.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: men who have sex with men (MSM). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 69.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: transgender and gender diverse persons. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 70.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. HIV infection: detection, counseling, and referral. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 71.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: persons in correctional facilities. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- 72.Dombrowski JC, Wierzbicki MR, Newman LM, et al. Doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia in men who have sex with men: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:824-31.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 73.Lau A, Kong FYS, Fairley CK, et al. Azithromycin or doxycycline for asymptomatic rectal Chlamydia trachomatis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2418-27.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 74.Khosropour CM, Dombrowski JC, Barbee LA, Manhart LE, Golden MR. Comparing azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydial infection: a retrospective cohort study. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:79-85.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 75.Kong FY, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, et al. The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:1290-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 76.Manavi K, Hettiarachchi N, Hodson J. Comparison of doxycycline with azithromycin in treatment of pharyngeal chlamydia infection. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27:1303-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 77.Geisler WM, Uniyal A, Lee JY, et al. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2512-21.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 78.Thorpe EM Jr, Stamm WE, Hook EW 3rd, et al. Chlamydial cervicitis and urethritis: single dose treatment compared with doxycycline for seven days in community based practises. Genitourin Med. 1996;72:93-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 79.Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Wolffs PFG, De Vries H, et al. Treatment effectiveness of azithromycin and doxycycline in uncomplicated rectal and vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women: a multicenter observational study (FemCure). Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:1946-54.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 80.Adair CD, Gunter M, Stovall TG, McElroy G, Veille JC, Ernest JM. Chlamydia in pregnancy: a randomized trial of azithromycin and erythromycin. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:165-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 81.Kacmar J, Cheh E, Montagno A, Peipert JF. A randomized trial of azithromycin versus amoxicillin for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnancy. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001;9:197-202.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 82.Pitsouni E, Iavazzo C, Athanasiou S, Falagas ME. Single-dose azithromycin versus erythromycin or amoxicillin for Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:213-21.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 83.Rahangdale L, Guerry S, Bauer HM, et al. An observational cohort study of Chlamydia trachomatis treatment in pregnancy. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:106-10.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 84.Bernstein KT, Stephens SC, Barry PM, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission from the oropharynx to the urethra among men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1793-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 85.Marcus JL, Kohn RP, Barry PM, Philip SS, Bernstein KT. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission from the female oropharynx to the male urethra. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:372-3.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 86.Fung M, Scott KC, Kent CK, Klausner JD. Chlamydial and gonococcal reinfection among men: a systematic review of data to evaluate the need for retesting. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83:304-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 87.Hosenfeld CB, Workowski KA, Berman S, et al. Repeat infection with Chlamydia and gonorrhea among females: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36:478-89.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 88.Lazenby GB, Korte JE, Tillman S, Brown FK, Soper DE. A recommendation for timing of repeat Chlamydia trachomatis test following infection and treatment in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28:902-909.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 89.Renault CA, Israelski DM, Levy V, Fujikawa BK, Kellogg TA, Klausner JD. Time to clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis ribosomal RNA in women treated for chlamydial infection. Sex Health. 2011;8:69-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 90.Golden MR, Whittington WL, Handsfield HH, et al. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:676-85.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 91.Schillinger JA, Kissinger P, Calvet H, et al. Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women: a randomized, controlled trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:49-56.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 92.Klausner JD, Chaw JK. Patient-delivered therapy for chlamydia: putting research into practice. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:509-11.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 93.Zikic A, Schünemann H, Wi T, Lincetto O, Broutet N, Santesso N. Treatment of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018;7:e107-e115.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 94.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants following pertussis prophylaxis with erythromycin--Knoxville, Tennessee, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:1117-20.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 95.Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Himelright IM, et al. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis after pertussis prophylaxis with erythromcyin: a case review and cohort study. Lancet. 1999;354:2101-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 96.Eberly MD, Eide MB, Thompson JL, Nylund CM. Azithromycin in early infancy and pyloric stenosis. Pediatrics. 2015;135:483-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- 97.Smith C, Egunsola O, Choonara I, Kotecha S, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Sammons H. Use and safety of azithromycin in neonates: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008194.[PubMed Abstract] -
Additional References
- Adams DA, Jajosky RA, Ajani U, et al. Summary of notifiable diseases--United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;61:1-121.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Althaus CL, Heijne JC, Low N. Towards more robust estimates of the transmissibility of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39:402-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Apewokin SK, Geisler WM, Bachmann LH. Spontaneous resolution of extragenital chlamydial and gonococcal infections prior to therapy. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37:343-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Augenbraun M, Bachmann L, Wallace T, Dubouchet L, McCormack W, Hook EW 3rd. Compliance with doxycycline therapy in sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25:1-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Bachmann LH, Stephens J, Richey CM, Hook EW 3rd. Measured versus self-reported compliance with doxycycline therapy for chlamydia-associated syndromes: high therapeutic success rates despite poor compliance. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:272-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Barbee LA, Khosropour CM, Dombrowski JC, Manhart LE, Golden MR. An estimate of the proportion of symptomatic gonococcal, chlamydial and non-gonococcal non-chlamydial urethritis attributable to oral sex among men who have sex with men: a case-control study. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92:155-60.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Batteiger BE, Xu F, Johnson RE, Rekart ML. Protective immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: evidence from human studies. J Infect Dis. 2010;201 Suppl 2:S178-89.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Bernstein KT, Stephens SC, Barry PM, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission from the oropharynx to the urethra among men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1793-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Black CM, Marrazzo J, Johnson RE, et al. Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3757-63.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Brihmer C, Mårdh PA, Kallings I, et al. Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus lymecyline in the treatment of genital chlamydial infections in women. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28:451-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Brunham RC. Immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1796-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Brunham RC. Immunology. A Chlamydia vaccine on the horizon. Science. 2015;348:1322-3.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Burstein GR, Snyder MH, Conley D, Boekeloo BO, Quinn TC, Zenilman JM. Adolescent chlamydia testing practices and diagnosed infections in a large managed care organization. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:477-83.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Cantor A, Dana T, Griffin JC, et al. Screening for Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;326:957-66.[PubMed Abstract] -
- CDC Fact Sheet. Incidence, prevalence, and cost of sexually transmitted infections in the United States. February 2013.[CDC] -
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2020. Chlamydia. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; April 2022.
- Charoenwatanachokchai A, Chitwarakorn A, Palanuvej T, Pakdeewong S, Khumhaeng M, Kreaurat M. Azithromycin in non-gonococcal urethritis. J Med Assoc Thai. 1997;80:440-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Charoenwatanachokchai A, Chitwarakorn A, Siriwongrangsun P, Pariyasak W, Yenyasun N, Sukwit S. Azithromycin in the treatment of chlamydial cervicitis and eradication of Ureaplasma urealyticum in female lower genital tract. J Med Assoc Thai. 1997;80:343-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Chesson HW, Bernstein KT, Gift TL, Marcus JL, Pipkin S, Kent CK. The cost-effectiveness of screening men who have sex with men for rectal chlamydial and gonococcal infection to prevent HIV Infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:366-71.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Cook RL, Hutchison SL, Østergaard L, Braithwaite RS, Ness RB. Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:914-25.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Datta SD, Torrone E, Kruszon-Moran D, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis trends in the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999-2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39:92-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Drummond F, Ryder N, Wand H, et al. Is azithromycin adequate treatment for asymptomatic rectal chlamydia? Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22:478-80.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Elgalib A, Alexander S, Tong CY, White JA. Seven days of doxycycline is an effective treatment for asymptomatic rectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22:474-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Gérard HC, Carter JD, Hudson AP. Chlamydia trachomatis is present and metabolically active during the remitting phase in synovial tissues from patients with chronic Chlamydia-induced reactive arthritis. Am J Med Sci. 2013;346:22-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Gaydos CA, Quinn TC, Willis D, et al. Performance of the APTIMA Combo 2 assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female urine and endocervical swab specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:304-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Geisler WM, Koltun WD, Abdelsayed N, et al. Safety and efficacy of WC2031 versus vibramycin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:82-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Geisler WM. Diagnosis and Management of Uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Adolescents and Adults: Summary of Evidence Reviewed for the 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61 Suppl 8:S774-84.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Genç M, Mårdh A. A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:1-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Hadgu A, Dendukuri N, Hilden J. Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests in the absence of a perfect gold-standard test: a review of the statistical and epidemiologic issues. Epidemiology. 2005;16:604-12.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Hafner LM. Pathogenesis of fallopian tube damage caused by Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Contraception. 2015;92:108-15.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Hathorn E, Opie C, Goold P. What is the appropriate treatment for the management of rectal Chlamydia trachomatis in men and women? Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88:352-4.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Hueston WJ, Lenhart JG. A decision analysis to guide antibiotic selection for Chlamydia infection during pregnancy. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:551-5.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Ito S, Yasuda M, Seike K, et al. Clinical and microbiological outcomes in treatment of men with non-gonococcal urethritis with a 100-mg twice-daily dose regimen of sitafloxacin. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18:414-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Joesoef MR, Weinstock HS, Johnson RE. Factors associated with recurrent chlamydial infection and failure to return for retesting in young women entering national job training program, 1998--2005. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:368-71.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Katusic D, Petricek I, Mandic Z, et al. Azithromycin vs doxycycline in the treatment of inclusion conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:447-51.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Kjaer HO, Dimcevski G, Hoff G, Olesen F, Ostergaard L. Recurrence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection evaluated by mailed samples obtained at home: 24 weeks' prospective follow up study. Sex Transm Infect. 2000;76:169-72.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Kong FY, Tabrizi SN, Law M, et al. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital chlamydia infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:193-205.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Larsen B, Glover DD. Serum erythromycin levels in pregnancy. Clin Ther. 1998;20:971-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Lau CY, Qureshi AK. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for genital chlamydial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:497-502.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Lee VF, Tobin JM, Harindra V. Re-infection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients presenting to the genitourinary medicine clinic in Portsmouth: the chlamydia screening pilot study - three years on. Int J STD AIDS. 2004;15:744-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Li B, Hocking JS, Bi P, Bell C, Fairley CK. The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline treatment for rectal chlamydial infection: a retrospective cohort study in South Australia. Intern Med J. 2018;48:259-64.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Louik C, Werler MM, Mitchell AA. Erythromycin use during pregnancy in relation to pyloric stenosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:288-90.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Mabey D, Peeling RW. Lymphogranuloma venereum. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78:90-2.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Magid D, Douglas JM Jr, Schwartz JS. Doxycycline compared with azithromycin for treating women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:389-99.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Manhart LE, Gillespie CW, Lowens MS, et al. Standard treatment regimens for nongonococcal urethritis have similar but declining cure rates: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:934-42.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Martin DH, Jones RB, Johnson RB. A phase-II study of trovafloxacin for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:369-73.[PubMed Abstract] -
- McCormack WM, Martin DH, Hook EW 3rd, Jones RB. Daily oral grepafloxacin vs. twice daily oral doxycycline in the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6:109-15.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Meyers D, Wolff T, Gregory K, et al. USPSTF recommendations for STI screening. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77:819-24.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Mikamo H, Ninomiya M, Tamaya T. Clinical efficacy of clarithromycin against uterine cervical and pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction to detect C. trachomatis at various time points after treatment. J Infect Chemother. 2003;9:282-3.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Mikamo H, Sato Y, Hayasaki Y, Hua YX, Tamaya T. Adequate levofloxacin treatment schedules for uterine cervicitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Chemotherapy. 2000;46:150-2.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Mikamo H, Sato Y, Hayasaki Y, Tamaya T. Adequate macrolide treatment schedules for uterine cervicitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Chemotherapy. 1999;45:396-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Miller WC, Ford CA, Morris M, et al. Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:2229-36.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Niccolai LM, Hochberg AL, Ethier KA, Lewis JB, Ickovics JR. Burden of recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young women: further uncovering the "hidden epidemic". Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:246-51.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Ota KV, Fisman DN, Tamari IE, et al. Incidence and treatment outcomes of pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men who have sex with men: a 13-year retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1237-43.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Owusu-Edusei K Jr, Chesson HW, Gift TL, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:197-201.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Peipert JF, Sweet RL, Walker CK, Kahn J, Rielly-Gauvin K. Evaluation of ofloxacin in the treatment of laparoscopically documented acute pelvic inflammatory disease (salpingitis). Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1999;7:138-44.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Peterman TA, Tian LH, Metcalf CA, et al. High incidence of new sexually transmitted infections in the year following a sexually transmitted infection: a case for rescreening. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:564-72.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Peters RP, Nijsten N, Mutsaers J, Jansen CL, Morré SA, van Leeuwen AP. Screening of oropharynx and anorectum increases prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in female STD clinic visitors. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:783-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Peters RP, Verweij SP, Nijsten N, et al. Evaluation of sexual history-based screening of anatomic sites for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in men having sex with men in routine practice. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:203.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Petitta A, Hart SM, Bailey EM. Economic evaluation of three methods of treating urogenital chlamydial infections in the emergency department. Pharmacotherapy. 1999;19:648-54.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Phillips I, Dimian C, Barlow D, et al. A comparative study of two different regimens of sparfloxacin versus doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis in men. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37 Suppl A:123-34.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Postma MJ, Welte R, van den Hoek JA, van Doornum GJ, Jager HC, Coutinho RA. Cost-effectiveness of partner pharmacotherapy in screening women for asymptomatic infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Value Health. 2001;4:266-75.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Rastogi S, Das B, Salhan S, Mittal A. Effect of treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;80:129-37.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Romoren M, Rahman M, Sundby J, Hjortdahl P. Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnancy: effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in Botswana. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:395-400.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Sanders CJ, Mulder MM. Periurethral gland abscess: aetiology and treatment. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:276-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:187-93.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Schwebke JR, Rompalo A, Taylor S, et al. Re-evaluating the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens--a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:163-70.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Scott Lamontagne D, Baster K, Emmett L, et al. Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16-24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83:292-303.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Somani J, Bhullar VB, Workowski KA, Farshy CE, Black CM. Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:1421-7.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Stamm WE, Batteiger BE, McCormack WM, Totten PA, Sternlicht A, Kivel NM. A randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose rifalazil with single-dose azithromycin for the empirical treatment of nongonococcal urethritis in men. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:545-52.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Stamm WE, Hicks CB, Martin DH, et al. Azithromycin for empirical treatment of the nongonococcal urethritis syndrome in men. A randomized double-blind study. JAMA. 1995;274:545-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Steedman NM, McMillan A. Treatment of asymptomatic rectal Chlamydia trachomatis: is single-dose azithromycin effective? Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20:16-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Stephens RS. The cellular paradigm of chlamydial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11:44-51.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Takahashi S, Ichihara K, Hashimoto J, et al. Clinical efficacy of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 7 days for patients with non-gonococcal urethritis. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17:392-6.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Takahashi S, Matsukawa M, Kurimura Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of azithromycin for male nongonococcal urethritis. J Infect Chemother. 2008;14:409-12.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Tamarelle J, Thiébaut ACM, Sabin B, et al. Early screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young women for primary prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease (i-Predict): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18:534.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Tan HH, Chan RK. An open label comparative study of azithromycin and doxycycline in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis in males and Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis in female sex workers in an STD clinic in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 1999;40:519-23.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Tipple C, Hill SC, Smith A. Is screening for pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis warranted in high-risk groups? Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21:770-1.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Torrone E, Papp J, Weinstock H. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection among persons aged 14-39 years--United States, 2007-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:834-8.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Vaughan AS, Kelley CF, Luisi N, del Rio C, Sullivan PS, Rosenberg ES. An application of propensity score weighting to quantify the causal effect of rectal sexually transmitted infections on incident HIV among men who have sex with men. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:25.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Viravan C, Dance DA, Ariyarit C, et al. A prospective clinical and bacteriologic study of inguinal buboes in Thai men. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:233-9.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Wada K, Uehara S, Mitsuhata R, et al. Prevalence of pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among heterosexual men in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18:729-33.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Wang SA, Papp JR, Stamm WE, Peeling RW, Martin DH, Holmes KK. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures for Chlamydia trachomatis: a meeting report. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:917-23.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Watson EJ, Templeton A, Russell I, et al. The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:1021-31.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Wehbeh HA, Ruggeirio RM, Shahem S, Lopez G, Ali Y. Single-dose azithromycin for Chlamydia in pregnant women. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:509-14.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W Jr. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:6-10.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Whittington WL, Kent C, Kissinger P, et al. Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:117-23.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, et al. Lower genital tract infection and endometritis: insight into subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:456-63.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Wikström A, Rotzén-Ostlund M, Marions L. Occurrence of pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis is uncommon in patients with a suspected or confirmed genital infection. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:78-81.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: adolescents. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Detection of STIs in special populations: children. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187.
- Workowski KA, Stevens CE, Suchland RJ, et al. Clinical manifestations of genital infection due to Chlamydia trachomatis in women: differences related to serovar. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:756-60.[PubMed Abstract] -
- Xu F, Schillinger JA, Markowitz LE, Sternberg MR, Aubin MR, St Louis ME. Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: analysis through a surveillance case registry in Washington State, 1993-1998. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:1164-70.[PubMed Abstract] -
Figures
Figure 1 (Image Series). Chlamydia Cases Reported in the United States, 2022Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2022. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; April 2024.Figure 2. Life Cycle of ChlamydiaIllustration by Jared Travnicek and David Ehlert, Cognition StudioFigure 3. Chlamydia trachomatis and Ascension to the Upper Genital Tract in Women-Source: Wiesenfeld HC. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:765-73.Reproduced with permission from the Massachusetts Medical Society. Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.Figure 4. Adult Chlamydial Inclusion Conjunctivitis-Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Image Library (Susan Lindsley, 1978).Figure 5. Reiter's Syndrome and Circinate BalanitisSource: photograph from Seattle & King County Sexual Health Clinic Clinic.Figure 6 (Image Series). Azithromycin versus Doxycycline in Asymptomatic Rectal Chlamydial Infections in Men who have Sex with MenSource: Lau A, Kong FYS, Fairley CK, et al. Azithromycin or doxycycline for asymptomatic rectal Chlamydia trachomatis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2418-27.Figure 6B. Results: Microbiologic Cure at 4 WeeksSource: Lau A, Kong FYS, Fairley CK, et al. Azithromycin or doxycycline for asymptomatic rectal Chlamydia trachomatis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2418-27.Figure 7 (Image Series). Azithromycin versus Doxycycline in Uncomplicated Rectal and Vaginal Chlamydial Infections in Women (FEMCure)Source: Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Wolffs PFG, De Vries H, et al. Treatment effectiveness of azithromycin and doxycycline in uncomplicated rectal and vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women: a multicenter observational study (FemCure). Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:1946-54.Figure 7B. Results: Microbiologic Cure at 4 WeeksSource: Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Wolffs PFG, De Vries H, et al. Treatment effectiveness of azithromycin and doxycycline in uncomplicated rectal and vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women: a multicenter observational study (FemCure). Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:1946-54.Tables
Table 1. 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines: Chlamydial InfectionsTreatment of Chlamydial Infections Among Adolescents and AdultsRecommended RegimenDoxycycline100 mg orally twice a day for 7 daysDoxycycline
Tradename:Doryx, VibramycinAlternative RegimensAzithromycin1 g orally in a single doseAzithromycin
Tradename:ZithromaxAlternative RegimensLevofloxacin500 mg orally once daily for 7 daysLevofloxacin
Tradename:LevaquinNote: Doxycycline is also available in a more costly delayed-release 200-mg tablet formulation, which requires once-daily dosing for 7 days and is equally effective as doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days for treating urogenital chlamydial infection in men and women.Source: Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Chlamydial infections. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187. [2021 STI Treatment Guidelines]Table 2. 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines: Chlamydial InfectionsTreatment of Chlamydial Infections During PregnancyRecommended RegimenAzithromycin1 g orally in a single doseAzithromycin
Tradename:ZithromaxAlternative RegimenAmoxicillin500 mg orally three times a day for 7 daysAmoxicillin
Tradename:Source: Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Chlamydial infections. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187. [2021 STI Treatment Guidelines]Table 4. 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines: Chlamydial InfectionsTreatment of Chlamydial Infection Among NeonatesRecommended RegimensErythromycin base50 mg/kg/day orally divided into 4 doses daily for 14 days*Erythromycin base
Tradename:ErycRecommended RegimensErythromycin ethylsuccinate50 mg/kg/day orally divided into 4 doses daily for 14 days*Erythromycin ethylsuccinate
Tradename:E.E.S., EryPed*An association between oral erythromycin and azithromycin and infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) has been reported in infants aged <6 weeks. Infants treated with either of these antimicrobials should be followed for IHPS signs and symptoms.Source: Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Chlamydial infections. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187. [2021 STI Treatment Guidelines]Table 5. 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines: Chlamydial InfectionsTreatment of Chlamydial Pneumonia Among InfantsRecommended RegimensErythromycin base50 mg/kg/day orally divided into 4 doses daily for 14 daysErythromycin base
Tradename:ErycRecommended RegimensErythromycin ethylsuccinate50 mg/kg/day orally divided into 4 doses daily for 14 daysErythromycin ethylsuccinate
Tradename:E.E.S., EryPedAlternative RegimenAzithromycin oral suspension20 mg/kg/day, 1 dose daily for 3 daysAzithromycin oral suspension
Tradename:Zithromax oral suspensionSource: Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Chlamydial infections. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187. [2021 STI Treatment Guidelines]Table 6. 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines: Chlamydial InfectionsTreatment of Chlamydial Infections Among Infants and ChildrenRecommended Regimens for Infants and Children Who Weigh <45 kgErythromycin base50 mg/kg/day orally divided into 4 doses daily for 14 daysErythromycin base
Tradename:ErycNote: Data are limited regarding the effectiveness and optimal dose of azithromycin for treating chlamydial infection among infants and children weighing <45 kgRecommended Regimens for Infants and Children Who Weigh <45 kgErythromycin ethylsuccinate50 mg/kg/day orally divided into 4 doses daily for 14 daysErythromycin ethylsuccinate
Tradename:E.E.S., EryPedNote: Data are limited regarding the effectiveness and optimal dose of azithromycin for treating chlamydial infection among infants and children weighing <45 kgRecommended Regimen for Children Who Weigh ≥45 kg but Aged <8 YearsAzithromycin1 g orally in a single doseAzithromycin
Tradename:ZithromaxRecommended Regimens for Children Aged ≥8 yearsAzithromycin1 g orally in a single doseAzithromycin
Tradename:ZithromaxRecommended Regimens for Children Aged ≥8 yearsDoxycycline100 mg orally twice a day for 7 daysDoxycycline
Tradename:Doryx, VibramycinSource: Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. Chlamydial infections. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(No. RR-4):1-187. [2021 STI Treatment Guidelines]Share by e-mail
Check
-On-
Learning
QuestionsThe Check-on-Learning Questions are short and topic related. They are meant to help you stay on track throughout each lesson and check your understanding of key concepts.You must be signed in to customize your interaction with these questions.
Funded byCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement (CDC-RFA-PS20-2004)Created at University of WashingtonPart of IDEA PlatformCME provided byUniversity of Alabama BirminghamCNE provided byUniversity of Washington School of NursingCopyright © 2024 National STD CurriculumSince you've received 80% or better on this quiz, you may claim continuing education credit.
You seem to have a popup blocker enabled. If you want to skip this dialog please Always allow popup windows for the online course.
Current Version: nstdc-master-8340a5a2-2024-11-13-205618 - 0%Lesson 2